Comments on: OWL panel, documents, comments… http://ivan-herman.name/2009/01/15/owl-panel-documents-comments/ Sat, 12 May 2012 13:27:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Ivan Herman http://ivan-herman.name/2009/01/15/owl-panel-documents-comments/#comment-4986 Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:45:31 +0000 http://ivan-herman.name/?p=236#comment-4986 Frank :-)

But yes, there are enough comments now. But I do believe it is good, better now than later.I must say that some of the comments were, in my personal view, led by the fact that the group made big mistakes in getting through certain messages or, in some cases, some messages were simply lost. A typical example is the role of RDF in OWL 2 (which, in spite of the impression given, has not changed, technically, compared to OWL 1). Hopefully this will be adequately addressed… (it has to!:-). As you say, I am also very curious to see what will happen.

Cheers

I.

]]> By: Frank van Harmelen http://ivan-herman.name/2009/01/15/owl-panel-documents-comments/#comment-4984 Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:07:24 +0000 http://ivan-herman.name/?p=236#comment-4984 Well, you can’t complain now: just before (and after) the official deadline, dozens of comments on OWL2 flooded in, and of very different nature. Some very positive, some strongly critical; some detailed and informed, some obviously drafted in for drummed up support. Very curious to see where this will go…

]]> By: Uldis Bojars http://ivan-herman.name/2009/01/15/owl-panel-documents-comments/#comment-4972 Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:15:04 +0000 http://ivan-herman.name/?p=236#comment-4972 Here are some photos from the panel (and ISWC’08 in general):

http://www.flickr.com/photos/captsolo/sets/72157608748627759/

]]>