Comments on: Setting up an RDFa file with apache http://ivan-herman.name/2008/02/22/setting-up-an-rdfa-with-apache/ Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:00:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: RDFa profile and new URI : Alexandre Passant http://ivan-herman.name/2008/02/22/setting-up-an-rdfa-with-apache/#comment-4625 RDFa profile and new URI : Alexandre Passant Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:01:56 +0000 http://ivanherman.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-4625 [...] extracted RDF one, depending on the Accept header, combining some rewrite rules that Ivan Herman defined for the SW Faq and the .htaccess used for the Flickr wrapper. My old foaf.rdf file is also now [...] [...] extracted RDF one, depending on the Accept header, combining some rewrite rules that Ivan Herman defined for the SW Faq and the .htaccess used for the Flickr wrapper. My old foaf.rdf file is also now [...]

]]> By: Sergio Fernandez http://ivan-herman.name/2008/02/22/setting-up-an-rdfa-with-apache/#comment-4615 Sergio Fernandez Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:37:39 +0000 http://ivanherman.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-4615 And <a href="http://idi.fundacionctic.org/vapour?vocabUri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ivan-herman.net%2FIvan_Herman&classUri=&propertyUri=&htmlVersions=1" rel="nofollow">it works really well</a> (ignore the last test, Vapour purpose is other). And it works really well (ignore the last test, Vapour purpose is other).

]]> By: masaka http://ivan-herman.name/2008/02/22/setting-up-an-rdfa-with-apache/#comment-4614 masaka Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:27:14 +0000 http://ivanherman.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-4614 Ivan, Firefox+Tabulator (FF+Tab) will accept application/rdf+xml, but q=0.93, i.e. it prefers XHTML to RDF when the former variant available. From SW-FAQ, however, FF+Tab receives RDF version (it's fun, though ;-), and I cannot read XHTML content. Probably, this content negotiation will better serve if it takes account of q parameter in accept header. cheers, Ivan,

Firefox+Tabulator (FF+Tab) will accept application/rdf+xml, but q=0.93, i.e. it prefers XHTML to RDF when the former variant available. From SW-FAQ, however, FF+Tab receives RDF version (it’s fun, though ;-) , and I cannot read XHTML content.

Probably, this content negotiation will better serve if it takes account of q parameter in accept header.

cheers,

]]> By: Geospatial Semantic Web Blog - GIS Data Integration, Geo Ontology, Geo Tagging & Geo Web 2.0 News » Blog Archive » A solution to the RDF publishing dilemma http://ivan-herman.name/2008/02/22/setting-up-an-rdfa-with-apache/#comment-4612 Geospatial Semantic Web Blog - GIS Data Integration, Geo Ontology, Geo Tagging & Geo Web 2.0 News » Blog Archive » A solution to the RDF publishing dilemma Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:26:26 +0000 http://ivanherman.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-4612 [...] a simple solution that solves the RDF publishing dilemma. You can read about the details in Ivan’s post. The basic idea is that Web publishers will use RDFa to describe semantic information in an HTML [...] [...] a simple solution that solves the RDF publishing dilemma. You can read about the details in Ivan’s post. The basic idea is that Web publishers will use RDFa to describe semantic information in an HTML [...]

]]> By: Ivan Herman http://ivan-herman.name/2008/02/22/setting-up-an-rdfa-with-apache/#comment-4611 Ivan Herman Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:27:52 +0000 http://ivanherman.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-4611 Masaka, I am not sure I understand. The setup is such that if a client uses the URI .../SW-FAQ, and sets application/rdf+xml in the accept header, then the RDF is returned. I would think that this is what these UAs do... (I may miss something) Masaka,

I am not sure I understand. The setup is such that if a client uses the URI …/SW-FAQ, and sets application/rdf+xml in the accept header, then the RDF is returned. I would think that this is what these UAs do…

(I may miss something)

]]> By: masaka http://ivan-herman.name/2008/02/22/setting-up-an-rdfa-with-apache/#comment-4607 masaka Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:41:36 +0000 http://ivanherman.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-4607 Hi, con neg is generally good, but I'm afraid this makes XHTML content hard to use for some UAs, e.g. Firefox + Tabulator addon (that accepts application/rdf+xml) Hi, con neg is generally good, but I’m afraid this makes XHTML content hard to use for some UAs, e.g. Firefox + Tabulator addon (that accepts application/rdf+xml)

]]>