Comments on: Yet another RDFa processor… http://ivan-herman.name/2007/09/03/yet-another-rdfa-processor%e2%80%a6/ Sat, 12 May 2012 13:27:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Ivan Herman http://ivan-herman.name/2007/09/03/yet-another-rdfa-processor%e2%80%a6/#comment-4690 Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:12:23 +0000 http://ivanherman.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/yet-another-rdfa-processor%e2%80%a6/#comment-4690 Peter: indeed, I do not have any. For the basic usage, the RDFa documents (primer, etc) should do; I should indeed write some words on how the distiller could be incorporated into a Python application. On my to-do list…

Thanks

Ivan

]]> By: Peter Krantz http://ivan-herman.name/2007/09/03/yet-another-rdfa-processor%e2%80%a6/#comment-4689 Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:39:10 +0000 http://ivanherman.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/yet-another-rdfa-processor%e2%80%a6/#comment-4689 The distiller works great. (Tried it with some documents from eurlex.nu). Are you planning on adding any code samples or tutorials for your RDFa parser? I had a look but can’t find any.

]]> By: Ivan Herman http://ivan-herman.name/2007/09/03/yet-another-rdfa-processor%e2%80%a6/#comment-1910 Tue, 04 Sep 2007 06:56:27 +0000 http://ivanherman.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/yet-another-rdfa-processor%e2%80%a6/#comment-1910 Carmen: no, it is not that I like tools that fail. But, as I said in my blog, the primary purpose for writing this code was to be a proof of concept on the core RDFa processing and, for me, using a proper XML DOM was the quickest way of doing that. I would be thrilled if somebody (you?) wrote a version using some other tools…

]]> By: Ivan Herman http://ivan-herman.name/2007/09/03/yet-another-rdfa-processor%e2%80%a6/#comment-1909 Tue, 04 Sep 2007 06:52:42 +0000 http://ivanherman.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/yet-another-rdfa-processor%e2%80%a6/#comment-1909 Michael: yes, I will have to find some time for a more proper error handling… As for the specific error issue: at present, the Curie syntax is not used in RDFa. The rdf typing that you want to achieve should use the instanceof attribute. As I said, the new RDFa syntax should still be published (hopefully in the coming weeks).

]]> By: carmen http://ivan-herman.name/2007/09/03/yet-another-rdfa-processor%e2%80%a6/#comment-1908 Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:52:29 +0000 http://ivanherman.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/yet-another-rdfa-processor%e2%80%a6/#comment-1908 so presumably it fails with HTML[45], and 99% of the content on the web.

i often wonder why people dont use HPricot, jQuery and similar for RDFa parsing, thus piggyback on parsers that work with realworld content – . i guess they like tools that fail..

]]> By: Michael Hausenblas http://ivan-herman.name/2007/09/03/yet-another-rdfa-processor%e2%80%a6/#comment-1905 Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:33:43 +0000 http://ivanherman.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/yet-another-rdfa-processor%e2%80%a6/#comment-1905 Congrats! Great job.

Indeed, a proper error handling (and explanation of errors) might be a good idea …

When I run my XHTML/RDFa FOAF page (http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml) through it, currently a nasty error pops up … might be too much for an RDFa novice ;)

Cheers,
Michael

]]>